| 理想体重指数和体质指数评价住院患者营养状况的比较 |
| 投稿时间：2009-10-20 修订日期：2009-11-29 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：周金花、蔡东联.理想体重指数和体质指数评价住院患者营养状况的比较[J].医学研究杂志,2010,39(1):55-57 |
| DOI：
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1498 |
| 全文下载次数: 1468 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:目的观察理想体重指数和体质指数评价营养状况的差异性和相关性，以便更好地进行营养评价。方法选择符合条件的住院患者，男性162例和女性150例，以两种方法评价营养状况，评价标准都采用中国的标准。结果住院患者营养不良发病率接近50%，两种方法营养正常的检出率无统计学差异（P>0.05），理想体重指数对营养不足和肥胖的检出率相对较高，而对超重的检出率相对较低（P<0.05）。营养过剩检出率，BMI法较高（P<0.05）。性别对两种评价方法都无统计学差异。结论两种评价方法效果存在较明显的统计学差异，不可单独用一项指标断定营养状况，两者可以结合使用以减少评价误差，最好结合多种评价方法使用，尤其是男性。 |
| 中文关键词:理想体重指数、体质指数、营养状况 |
| |
| A Comparison Study on Ideal Body Mass Index and Body Mass Index for Assessing Nutritional Status of Hospitalized Patients |
|
|
| Abstract:ObjectiveWe observed the relevance and difference between ideal body mass index and body mass index for assessing nutritional status in order to make better nutritional assessment. MethodsWe selected hospitalized patients, male 162 and female 150,and evaluated nutritional status in the two ways.The evaluation criteria adopted Chinese standards. ResultsThe incidence of malnutrition was nearly 50%. The rate of normal nutrition was no statistic difference between the two methods(P> 0.05).The ideal body mass index of undernutrition and obesity prevalence was relatively high, while overweight rate was relatively low (P<0.05). The rate of overweight in BMI method was higher (P<0.05). Gender on the two kinds of evaluation methods was no statistically significant. Conclusion Very obvious difference was seen between the two kinds of evaluation methods,so we can not use one of the methods alone to determine the nutritional status.We should combine the two methods to reduce the error.It is best to use multiple methods, particularly in men. |
| keywords:Ideal body mass index Body mass index Nutritional status |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
