| 创伤性鼓膜穿孔缘鼓膜瓣的预后及转归 |
| 投稿时间：2010-12-22 修订日期：2010-12-31 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：楼正才.创伤性鼓膜穿孔缘鼓膜瓣的预后及转归[J].医学研究杂志,2012,41(1):75-79 |
| DOI：
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1033 |
| 全文下载次数: 908 |
|
| 基金项目:浙江省科技基金资助项目（2009C33097） |
|
| 中文摘要:目的回顾性研究外伤性鼓膜穿孔缘鼓膜瓣在穿孔愈合中的预后及转归。方法329耳穿孔缘有鼓膜瓣的外伤性鼓膜穿孔分成3组，分别给予保守治疗、明胶海绵贴片及耳内镜鼓膜瓣修复+明胶海绵贴片治疗。评估治疗3个月后穿孔闭合率及闭合时间、治疗前后气骨导间距变化、鼓膜瓣形态学变化。结果3个月后穿孔的成功闭合率分别是：保守治疗组9429%（66/70）、明胶海绵贴片组98.92%（92/93）、鼓膜瓣修复组98.24%（112/114），3组没有显著统计学差异（P=0.608）。穿孔闭合耳3组听力平均提高分别是6.4±0.83dB、7.2±1.65dB和9.6±2.37dB，差异没有统计学显著性(P>0.05)。鼓膜瓣修复组及明胶海绵贴片组与保守治疗组相比，穿孔平均闭合时间有显著差异（P<0.05），但鼓膜瓣修复组及明胶海绵贴片组的穿孔平均闭合时间无显著差异（P>0.05）。保守治疗组穿孔缘鼓膜瓣在1周内坏死形成痂皮；明胶海绵贴片组治疗2~3天后鼓膜瓣缘新生鼓膜增生，鼓膜瓣轮廓不明显；鼓膜瓣修复组1周后鼓膜瓣回缩于穿孔缘。结论鼓膜外伤性穿孔的不同治疗其穿孔缘的鼓膜瓣对穿孔闭合无明显影响，贴片治疗时鼓膜瓣修复没有必要。 |
| 中文关键词:鼓膜穿孔 皮瓣 治疗 |
| |
| Prognosis of Eardrum Flap in Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforation by Difference Treatment |
|
|
| Abstract:ObjectiveTo study the prognosis of eardrum flap in traumatic tympanic membrane (TM)perforation retrospectivly.MethodsTotally 329 patients of TM perforation were divided into three groups:conservative treatment,gelfoam patching,and and Edge-approximation plus Gelfoam Patching.Healing of perforation, hearing improvement, and complications were investigated after 3 months.ResultsClosure rates of the perforations in the Spontaneous Healing, Gelfoam Patching, and Edge-approximation plus Gelfoam Patching were 94.29%,98.92%,and 98.24%,respectively.The difference among them was not significant.Hearing improvement of three groups were （6.4±0.83）dB,(7.2±1.65)dB and (9.6 ±2.37)dB, respectively.The difference among them was not significant(P>0.05). Gelfoam Patching and Edge-approximation plus Gelfoam Patching significantly shortened the healing in Traumatic TM large Perforation.However, the difference among them was not significant in the closure time.ConclusionThe flap of the edge of TM perforation did not affect perforation closure.We should not repaire the flap of eardrm in patching treatment. |
| keywords:Tympanic membrane perforation Flap Treatment |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
