| 起搏器置入患者640层与64层CT冠状动脉造影图像质量和伪影的比较 |
| 投稿时间：2011-05-18 修订日期：2011-05-31 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：王振,丁忠祥,王博业,狄幸波,袁建华,徐健,陈军法,钟建国.起搏器置入患者640层与64层CT冠状动脉造影图像质量和伪影的比较[J].医学研究杂志,2012,41(2):32-36 |
| DOI：
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1111 |
| 全文下载次数: 1020 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:目的比较起搏器置入患者行640层容积CT与64层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影的图像质量和伪影，探讨CT冠状动脉造影的成功率和适用性。方法24例拟行CT冠状动脉造影的起搏器置入病例根据使用设备的不同分为A组（640层CT组）与B组（64层CT组）两组，请两位有经验的评价者双盲评价冠脉15个节段的图像质量以及各种伪影对冠脉节段的影响，同时记录辐射剂量和患者一般资料，并进行统计分析。结果两组之间的身高、体重等一般影响因素均无统计学差异。尽管A组的心率显著高于B组（A组的心率：71±16次/分；B组的心率：61±4次/分；P<0.001），但A组的辐射剂量显著低于B组（A组的ED：13.8±1.53 mSv ；B组的ED：9.14±5.65 mSv；P<0.001）。在起搏器置入患者冠状动脉图像可诊断率(1级+2级)的比较上，A组与B组间有统计差异（A组：99.06%，B组:93.27%，连续校正χ2=6.572，P<0.05）。影响两组冠状动脉图像质量的伪影有运动伪影、阶梯伪影、金属伪影、数据缺失等，各种伪影对冠状动脉图像质量的影响程度两组间有统计学差异(连续校正χ2=5.009，P<0.05)。其中，A组的冠状动脉图像伪影以不影响诊断的轻度伪影为主，占94.3%，中重度伪影节段仅占伪影节段总数的578%，而B组的冠状动脉中重度伪影节段占伪影总数的31.8%。结论起搏器置入患者行CT冠状动脉造影时，640层容积CT与64层螺旋CT均能提供优秀的图像质量，但640层容积CT以较高的图像可诊断率和较轻的伪影干扰而比64层螺旋CT具有更高的成功率和适用性。 |
| 中文关键词:起搏器 体层摄影术/X线计算机 冠状动脉造影 伪影 |
| |
| Comparative Study of Image Quality and the Artifact of Coronary Angiography between 640-slice and 64-slice CT in the Patients with Pacemaker |
|
|
| Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the image quality and artifact between 640-slice and 64-slice CT coronary angiography in the patients with pacemaker, and to evaluate the success rate and applicability of CT coronary angiography. MethodsTwenty-four patients with pacemaker were divided into two groups. Group A (16 patient) underwent 640-slice CT coronary angiography, and Group B (8 patient) underwent 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Image quality and artifact of the fifteen coronary segments were assessed by two blinded observers. Radiation dosage and patient′s common information were recorded. Data sets were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric statistical tests with the SPSS 13.0 software. ResultsThere was no significant difference in body weight and body height between the two groups. Radiation exposure was significantly higher with 64-slice CT than with 640-slice CT (13.8±1.53 mSv vs 9.14±5.65 mSv; P<0.001) despite significantly higher heart rates in the 640-slice CT group ［61±4bpm (beats per minute) vs 71±6bpm; P<0.001］. The rate of available diagnostic images was greater for images obtained with 640-slice CT than for images obtained with 64-slice CT(99.06% vs 93.27%; P<0.05). Artifacts were the cause of coronary arteries that cannot be evaluated for coronary MSCT angiography. They were blurring artifact, stairstep artifact, streak artifact, missing data. There were significant differences in these artifacts between the two groups(continuity corrected χ2=5.009，P<0.05). Artifacts of group A were mild (94.3%), and artifacts of group B were severe artifacts (31.8%). Conclusion640-slice and 64-slice CT coronary angiography have excellent image quality in patients with pacemaker. 640-slice CT provides significantly better diagnostic image quality and artifacts of little influence than those of 64-slice CT, and it had more success rate and applicability of CT coronary angiography. |
| keywords:Pacemaker Tomography/X-ray computed Coronary angiography Artifact |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
