血清CC-16水平用于ARDS患者预后的临床价值研究
投稿时间:2016-10-29  修订日期:2016-11-08  点此下载全文
引用本文:吕丽辉,杨玉波,付言杰,胡振杰,庄志雄,陈玺卿.血清CC-16水平用于ARDS患者预后的临床价值研究[J].医学研究杂志,2017,46(7):140-145
DOI: 10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2017.07.035
摘要点击次数: 1135
全文下载次数: 681
作者单位E-mail
吕丽辉 315040 宁波, 中国人民解放军第113医院呼吸内科  
杨玉波 315040 宁波, 中国人民解放军第113医院呼吸内科  
付言杰 315040 宁波, 中国人民解放军第113医院呼吸内科  
胡振杰 315040 宁波, 中国人民解放军第113医院呼吸内科  
庄志雄 315040 宁波, 中国人民解放军第113医院呼吸内科  
陈玺卿 315040 宁波, 中国人民解放军第113医院呼吸内科 chenxiqing198110@sina.com 
中文摘要:目的 探讨血清Clara细胞分泌蛋白-16(Clara cell protein-16,CC-16)水平用于急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者短期预后的临床价值。方法 纳入2014年4月~2016年4月住院的ARDS患者97例,根据ARDS严重程度分为轻度ARDS组(n=28)、中度ARDS组(n=33)及重度ARDS组(n=36)。根据住院30天病死情况,分为生存组(n=57)及病死组(n=40)。所有患者入院时检测常规实验室指标及血清CC-16水平,记录APACHEⅡ及SOFA评分。ROC曲线检测CC-16、APACHEⅡ及SOFA评分的预后价值。结果 不同严重程度ARDS患者血清CC-16水平由高至低分别为重度ARDS组(27.33±8.14ng/ml)、中度ARDS组(20.27±6.97ng/ml)及轻度ARDS组(13.87±5.23ng/ml)。住院30天内病死的ARDS患者基线血清CC-16水平显著高于生存患者(24.98±8.33 vs 18.03±8.05,P=0.000)。CC-16单独使用的AUC为0.782(95%CI:0.691~0.872),CC-16联合APACHEⅡ及SOFA评分的 AUC为0.811(95%CI:0.728~0.895)。基线血清CC-16水平较低(<18.78ng/ml)患者30天总体生存率显著高于CC-16水平较高(≥ 18.78ng/ml)的患者(83.7% vs 38.9%,P=0.000)。结论 血清CC-16水平可作为ARDS患者短期病死情况的预后指标。
中文关键词:急性呼吸窘迫综合征  Clara细胞分泌蛋白-16  急性生理与慢性健康评分Ⅱ  序贯器官衰竭评分  预后
 
Clinical Research of Prognostic Value of Serum CC-16 Levels in Patients with ARDS
Abstract:Objective To investigate the prognosis value of serum Clara cell protain-16 (CC-16) levels in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods A total of 97 patients with ARDS from April 2013 to April 2016 were enrolled, and they were divided into mild ARDS (n=28), moderate ARDS (n=33) and severe ARDS (n=36) group. According to the 30-day mortality, patients were divided into survival group (n=57) and death group (n=40). The routine laboratory parameters, serum CC-16 levels, APACHEⅡ score and SOFA scores were recorded. ROC curve was used to evaluate the prognostic value of CC-16 combined with APACHEⅡand(or) SOFA score. Results The CC-16 levels in patients with ARDS from highest to lowest were:severe ARDS group (27.33±8.14ng/ml), moderate ARDS group (20.27±6.97ng/ml) and mild ARDS group (13.87±5.23ng/ml). The baseline CC-16 levels in death group were significantly higher than survival group (24.98±8.33 vs 18.03±8.05ng/ml, P=0.000). The AUC of CC-16 used for prognosis in ARDS patients was 0.782 (95%CI:0.691-0.872) alone, and the AUC of CC-16 combined with APACHEⅡand SOFA score was 0.811 (95%CI:0.728-0.895). The 30-day overall survival in patients with low baseline serum CC-16 level(<18.78ng/ml) was significant higher than patients with high CC-16 level (≥ 18.78ng/ml) (83.7% vs 38.9%, P=0.000). Conclusion Serum CC-16 can be used as a useful prognostic indicator for short-term outcome in patients with ARDS.
keywords:Acute respiratory distress syndrome  Clara cell protein-16  Acute physiology,chronic health evaluation Ⅱ score  Sequential organ failure assessment  Prognosis
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

京公网安备 11010502037822号