| 3M Sof-LexTM、EVE DIAPRO及道邦玻璃陶瓷对IPS e.max CAD全瓷修复体抛光效果的对比 |
| 投稿时间：2024-09-19 修订日期：2024-10-30 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：付曼,裴飞,李爱芹,陈卓.3M Sof-LexTM、EVE DIAPRO及道邦玻璃陶瓷对IPS e.max CAD全瓷修复体抛光效果的对比[J].医学研究杂志,2025,54(3):120-125 |
| DOI：
10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2025.03.022 |
| 摘要点击次数: 30 |
| 全文下载次数: 25 |
|
| 基金项目:河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(LHGJ20191047) |
|
| 中文摘要:目的 比较3M Sof-LexTM、EVE DIAPRO及道邦玻璃陶瓷3种抛光套装工具对IPS e.max CAD全瓷修复体抛光效果的影响。方法 选取临床修复材料IPS e.max CAD玻璃陶瓷制作修复体120个,按表面处理方法分成4组:3M组(采用3M Sof-LexTM抛光套装)、EVE组(采用EVE DIAPRO抛光套装)、Tob组(采用道邦玻璃陶瓷抛光)及对照组(常规上釉处理),每组30个修复体。比较处理后各组的表面粗糙度、光泽度、维氏硬度、断裂韧性、细菌黏附量、色素沉着情况、挠曲强度及牙釉质磨损程度。结果 各组维氏硬度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；轮廓算数平均偏差(Ra值)从低到高依次为对照组＜3M组＜Tob组＜EVE组,细菌黏附量、不平度平均高度(Rz值)、色差值(△E值)从低到高依次为对照组＜3M组＜EVE组＜Tob组,光泽度、断裂韧性从高到低依次为对照组＞3M组＞EVE组＞Tob组,挠曲强度从高到低依次为3M组＞对照组＞EVE组＞Tob组,体积损失量从高到低依次为对照组＞Tob组＞EVE组＞3M组；光泽度、△E值、细菌黏附量、体积损失量各组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P＜0.05),Ra值、Rz值、断裂韧性等3M组与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05),与EVE组、Tob组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 不同抛光处理均能降低IPS e.max CAD全瓷表面粗糙度、细菌黏附量、色素沉着情况及牙釉质磨损程度,提高光泽度、断裂韧性及挠曲强度,其中3M Sof-LexTM抛光套装综合效果最佳,与上釉效果相似。 |
| 中文关键词:3M Sof-LexTM EVE DIAPRO 道邦玻璃陶瓷 IPS e.max CAD全瓷 抛光效果 |
| |
| Comparative of the Polishing Effect of 3M Sof-LexTM, EVE DIAPRO and TobooM glass-ceramic on IPS e.max CAD All-ceramic Restorations. |
|
|
| Abstract:Objective To compare the effects of 3M Sof-LexTM, EVE DIAPRO and TobooM glass-ceramic polishing kits on the polishing of IPS e.max CAD all-ceramic restorations. Methods A total of 120specimens of IPS e.max CAD glass-ceramic restorations were selected and divided into 4groups according to the surface treatment method:3M group (3M Sof-LexTM polishing kit), EVE group (EVE DIAPRO polishing kit), Tob group (TobooM glass-ceramic polishing) and the control group (conventional glazing treatment), 30specimens in each group. Surface roughness, gloss, Vickers hardness, fracture toughness, bacterial adhesion, pigmentation, flexural strength and degree of enamel wear were compared between the groups after treatment. Results There was no significant difference in Vickers hardness among the groups (P>0.05); the mean deviation of contour arithmetic (Ra value) from low to high in order of control group <3M group 3M group >EVE group>Tob group, flexural strength from high to low in order of 3M group>control group>EVE group>Tob group, volume loss from high to low in order of control group>Tob group>EVE group>3M group, there were no statistically significant differences in gloss, △E value, bacterial adhesion, volume loss among groups (P<0.05), there were no statistically significant differences in Ra value, Rz value, fracture toughness between 3M group and control group (P>0.05), and differed significantly from the EVE group and Tob group (P<0.05). Conclusion Different polishing treatments can reduce IPS e.max CAD all-ceramic surface roughness, the amount of bacterial adhesion, pigmentation and enamel abrasion, and improve gloss, fracture toughness and flexural strength, of which the 3M Sof-LexTM polishing set has the best overall effect, similar to the effect of glazing. |
| keywords:3M Sof-LexTM EVE DIAPRO TobooM glass-ceramic IPS e.max CAD all-ceramic Polishing effect |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
