| 支撑喉镜联合鼻内镜下微型电动切削声带良性肿物 |
| 投稿时间：2010-12-14 修订日期：2010-12-20 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：翟性友,董亚斌,陶学勇,侯保霞.支撑喉镜联合鼻内镜下微型电动切削声带良性肿物[J].医学研究杂志,2011,40(8):141-143 |
| DOI：
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1015 |
| 全文下载次数: 896 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:目的观察支撑喉镜联合鼻内镜下微型电动切削器切削声带良性肿物的疗效。方法选择108例临床可确诊为声带良性肿物患者，随机分为支撑喉镜联合鼻内镜下微型电动切削器切除声带良性肿物（观察组56例）与支撑喉联合镜鼻内镜下显微喉器械切除声带良性肿物（对照组52例），术后随访并观察6个月评定比较两组疗效。结果两组治愈率分别为92.86%和50%，有效率分别为98.21%和92.31%，临床治愈率差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论两种术式疗效前者较好，且手术容易操作、时间短。 |
| 中文关键词:良性肿物 声带 鼻内镜 支撑喉镜 微型电动器 |
| |
| Cutting Vocal Cord Benign Masses with Micro-electric Devices under Laryngoscope Combined Nasal Endoscope |
|
|
| Abstract:ObjectiveTo observe the effect of micro-electric devices in cutting vocal cord benign masses under laryngoscope combined nasal endoscope.Methods108 cases of vocal cord benign masses clinically diagnosed patients were randomly divided into laryngoscope combined nasal endoscope with micro-electric devices cutting vocal cord benign masses (study group,n=56) and the laryngoscope combined nasal endoscope with micro forceps cutting vocal cord benign masses (control group,n=52).Patients were followed up and assessed for 6 months after treatment.ResultsThe cure rates were 92.86% and 50%,and effective rate was 98.21% and 92.31%.The clinical cure rate had significant difference (P<0.05).ConclusionThe effect of the former is better than the latter,and the former is more easily operate and has shorter time. |
| keywords:Benign masses Vocal cords Nasal endoscope Laryngoscope Micro -electric devices |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
